Judging
The HCD Awards follow a rigorous multi-stage judging process.
The Human Factors & Ergonomics Society of Singapore (HFESS) appoints jury members based on their expertise, knowledge, and experience across design and user experience.
With their extensive professional backgrounds, the independent experts ensure a fair evaluation of all submissions and uphold the highest standards of the competition.
Evaluation Criteria
1
Relevance
&
Value
2
Innovation
&
Creativity
3
Holistic
&
Human-Centered Approach
4
Empowerment
&
Inclusivity
5
Impact, Feasibility
&
Responsibility
6
Design
&
User Experience
1 Relevance & Human Value
Submissions must demonstrate clear relevance within their application field or industry.
- Solutions should be grounded in real human insights, obtained through user research, observation, or participatory design.
- Designs must address substantial human challenges, improve everyday experiences, and create meaningful value – for individuals, communities, organizations, and the planet.
- Consideration of sustainable principles, resource-consciousness, and long-term impact is essential.
2 Innovation & Creative
Entries should propose new ways of addressing challenges in both physical and digital contexts.
- Innovative use of materials, forms, systems, or technologies to enhance human wellbeing.
- Application of existing solutions in novel, human-centered ways.
- Solutions should not only apply technology creatively but also humanize interactions between people, products, and environments.
3 Holistic & Human-Centered Approach
Great design considers the full ecosystem of use.
- Processes should integrate research, design, engineering, and business perspectives.
- Products and services must account for both direct users and the wider context of stakeholders, environments, and support systems.
- Designs should consider the entire lifecycle: from production and use to repair, reuse, and disposal.
4 Empowerment & Inclusivity
Solutions should empower people by extending their abilities, improving quality of life, or opening new opportunities.
- Physical products: support ergonomics, comfort, safety, and usability.
- Digital services: ensure intuitive interaction, accessibility, and inclusivity.
- All entries should demonstrate sensitivity to differences in age, physical and cognitive ability, cultural context, and education.
- Designs should strengthen participation, inclusion, and dignity, fostering trust and social cohesion.
5 Impact, Feasibility & Responsibility
Entries must show how the solution delivers tangible outcomes and sustainable business or societal value.
- Impact: measurable benefits such as improved wellbeing, efficiency, or safety.
- Feasibility: realistic pathways for implementation, production, or scaling.
- Responsibility: ethical use of materials, resources, and technologies, with transparency in processes (e.g., AI, automation, or data use).
- Designs should build trust and responsibility, whether in physical safety or digital privacy.
6 Design & User Experience
Excellence in design execution is a core criterion.
- Physical design: attention to ergonomics, haptics, durability, materials, and craftsmanship.
- Digital design: clarity, coherence, intuitive navigation, accessibility, and responsive interaction.
- Hybrid experiences: seamless integration across physical and digital touchpoints.
- Entries should demonstrate aesthetic quality, functional simplicity, and coherence with brand or purpose.
- Language, communication, and storytelling should complement the overall experience.
JURORS
Professor Ameersing Luximon
Hongkong